I'll drop back a couple of grains and get the job done up and find out what happens .I've and use alot of the 2400.Bought 2 of your previous Enfields #1 MKIII's and wish to test it in them also,have not loaded for them still but beeing a rifle bored out to 410ga it'd be which i could bump them up a bit more,a standard 410 shotshell wont healthy the chambers on these and I must fireform for them individually,the sights are riveted so I will have to control the load to get them to shoot proper.



The outstanding ballistic effectiveness of 410 generates perfect patterns. Constant effectiveness in almost any weather, shot soon after shot, lot right after large amount, would make the new 410 your reloading powder of decision.

As to migrating 296, I use the Spolar furnished rubber gromet down below an soon after sector pyrodex powder tube from SGW member skeeljc and There exists hardly any powder migration with my #405 Spolar.

I am nonetheless loading the previous design and style Winchesters although, haven't had to vacation resort to your HS nevertheless. Observed a Offer on about 15 flats of these a couple of a long time in the past, and purchased them all. I've only been utilizing the new kinds for competition, but I will be operating out soon.

I employed the self indexing aspect on the 9000G without the need of dilemma and constantly have. In the event you spill any shot, you then should have troubles.

I wound up setting up a plastic powder baffle to cut down on similar. I keep a can of bottled air useful to help keep down buildup at The bottom when reloading.




Now allow me to acquire it stage farther because you are coming out of H110/296 and heading into 410 powder. You are going to burn up up hulls at a considerably quicker charge, and could not even such as 410 loads when It is all explained and finished (inconsistency).

Include to quote Only exhibit this person #two · Jun seventeen, 2020 I've been utilizing H110 and do not like it. It is a ball powder and the charge bar desires to adhere following a shell or two. Possibly someone will chime in on what they use.

Powder appears to be a tiny bit filthy and maybe burns up the hulls a little more quickly, I believe (still easily get 5 reloads with out far too much near inspection and sorting-some past longer but require near glimpse following a few reloads). I’m conservative around the reloads and dispose previously than quite a few do I do think. Crimps are awesome in ninety nine% of your hulls even by way of numerous reloads. Over-all I like it ample to help keep working with it.

The data displayed on This great site, which includes ballistic data, was derived from tightly controlled laboratory ailments.

soon after five hundred or so rounds I really need to clean the powder gear space or matters begin to bind up somewhat. look here I'm nonetheless making an attempt to make a decision if the hull daily life is value the issues that came with it.

I just used my final pound of Alliant 2400. The only thing which i can find readily available which includes any semblance of a slow burning pistol powder is Alliant 410.




Although I have never tried out it I concur along with your imagining with a 4 ball load, appears like exactly the same trouble as I Beforehand outlined with a 5 pellet load of OOO buck.

They may be telling it here like it reall is. In the 410, there is not any much better propellant than H110/W296. It can get you the highest velocities, with pressures inside of purpose which is far simpler on circumstances than other powders and Alliant 410 is especially really hard on AA HS instances.